Application Architecture
System boundaries, coupling and cohesion, dependency structure, architectural patterns, APIs and integrations, scalability, maintainability, and legacy components.
Independent assessment of your application architecture, codebase, cloud infrastructure, and delivery process with a prioritized modernization roadmap.
Prefer to review the report style first? Start with our fictional Contoso assessment sample.
Your application has become difficult or risky to change.
Releases take too long or regularly cause problems.
You are migrating from .NET Framework to modern .NET.
You are planning a cloud migration or major architectural change.
Technical debt is accumulating and nobody can quantify or prioritize it.
Development velocity has dropped.
Teams disagree on technical direction.
You inherited a system and need to understand its risks.
You are preparing for significant growth.
Security and compliance requirements are increasing.
You are considering a rewrite and want an independent opinion first.
The rewrite scenario is commercially significant. Organizations regularly spend large amounts on rewrites that turn out to be unnecessary.
System boundaries, coupling and cohesion, dependency structure, architectural patterns, APIs and integrations, scalability, maintainability, and legacy components.
Not a line-by-line review. We look for systemic issues: dependency age, framework versions, complexity hotspots, testability, error handling, configuration, logging, and common anti-patterns.
For Azure and cloud workloads: architecture, networking, identity, scalability, resilience, resource organization, configuration, cost, and Infrastructure as Code.
The full delivery flow from commit to operation: branching, pipelines, artifact management, environment management, deployment strategy, rollback, secrets, approvals, and automation.
Architecture-level security, not a penetration test: authentication, authorization, secret management, dependency vulnerabilities, SAST, infrastructure exposure, least privilege, data protection, and software supply chain.
Logging, metrics, tracing, alerting, health checks, backups, disaster recovery, and incident response.
2-4 pages written for CTOs and management. Includes a status table across all domains, top 5 risks, top 5 opportunities, and a recommended strategy.
Engineering-focused findings, each structured as: Finding -> Evidence -> Impact -> Recommendation -> Priority.
Current state and recommended target state using C4 model terminology (Context, Containers, Components where useful).
60-120 minutes with relevant stakeholders. Covers current state, risks, options, recommendations, and roadmap. Trade-offs and disagreements are discussed explicitly.
Review a sanitized assessment for a fictional order management platform or a health care provider search engine. You can check the score format, the finding style, and the remediation roadmap your team will receive.
Gather documentation and access.
Review code, infrastructure, and delivery.
Conversations with leadership, engineering, and product.
Prepare the report and roadmap.
Present and discuss with your team.
Choose the right assessment scope for your system. Every engagement includes fixed pricing, concrete findings backed by code evidence, and a prioritized remediation roadmap.
Targeted review for single services, urgent second opinions, or pre-investment risk checks.
Full evaluation for multi-tier systems facing tech debt, slow releases, or planning modernization.
Multi-system analysis for distributed estates, multi-team platforms, or major rewrite decisions.
Compare evaluated areas, analysis depth, deliverables, and workshop formats across tiers.
| Feature & Scope | Architecture Snapshot from €3,500 | Technical Health from €8,000 | Enterprise from €15,000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Scope & System Coverage | |||
| Target System Scope | 1 core service or app | Full multi-tier system | Multi-service estate / portfolio |
| Source Repositories Scanned | Up to 2 repositories | Up to 5 repositories | Multiple repositories |
| Cloud & Environments | Single environment check | Dev, staging & production | Multi-subscription / hybrid cloud |
| Stakeholder Interviews | 1 Lead Engineer session | 2–3 Team & Lead sessions | 4+ Leadership & Team sessions |
| Engagement Duration | 3–5 business days | 2–3 weeks | 3–6 weeks |
| 2. Technical Analysis & NAAF Domains | |||
| NAAF 8-Domain Scoring | Top risk focus areas | Complete 8-domain rubric | Complete 8-domain rubric + cross-service heatmap |
| Code Quality & Hotspots | Static analysis & CVE scan | SonarQube, complexity & coupling | Multi-repo static analysis & dependency supply chain |
| Cloud & Infrastructure as Code | Basic resource inspection | Azure Advisor, IaC & security posture | Multi-account topology, drift & cloud spend audit |
| DevOps & Delivery Pipeline | Pipeline sanity check | CI/CD, artifact flow & rollback review | DORA metrics, release governance & automation |
| Observability & Resilience | Log setup verification | Logs, metrics, tracing & alert review | Outage cost modeling, SLO audit & DR test validation |
| Data Architecture & Integrity | Schema inspection | Migrations, foreign keys & query health | Data lineage, consistency & restore verification |
| 3. Deliverables & Artifacts | |||
| Executive Summary | 2-page risk memo | Executive report with domain scores | Executive briefing with business ROI & risk models |
| Engineering Finding Cards | Top 5 critical findings | All findings with code evidence | All findings + cross-domain cascade analysis |
| Architecture Diagrams | — | C4 Context & Container diagrams | Full C4 model (Context, Container, Component) |
| Actionable Roadmap | 30-day quick wins | 30-60-90 day prioritized backlog | Phased 12-month modernization roadmap |
| Rewrite vs Modernize Decision Matrix | — | Technical viability comparison | Financial model & risk-weighted decision matrix |
| 4. Workshops & Follow-Up | |||
| Findings Presentation Workshop | 60 minutes (Engineering) | 90 minutes (Engineering & Leads) | 2 workshops (Leadership + Engineering deep-dive) |
| Post-Assessment Follow-Up | Email Q&A support | Email Q&A + 30-day checkpoint call | 30-day implementation review session (60 min) |
| Select a package to start | Request Snapshot | Request Health Assessment | Discuss Enterprise |
We agree on repository counts, environments, and interview scope during discovery. You receive a fixed-price proposal without surprise hourly billing.
Final fees depend on total applications, source repositories, cloud subscriptions, background worker jobs, and stakeholder interview sessions.
Teams with specific compliance needs (such as NIS2, DORA, or ISO 27001) or multi-region setups receive customized engagement proposals.
Most projects run from 3 business days to 6 weeks, based on the package and system scope.
Yes. Access to code, infrastructure, and delivery tooling is required so we can produce findings with evidence.
Yes. We compare rewrite pressure against lower-risk modernization options so leadership can choose with clearer trade-offs.
You receive a prioritized action plan with immediate, 90-day, and 6-12 month recommendations your team can execute.
Automated tools identify symptoms. Senior engineers determine which findings matter, what to fix first, and what can wait.
Related services: IT Leadership & Strategy and Azure Cloud Services.